![realtek alc1220 driver asrock z270 realtek alc1220 driver asrock z270](https://www.itcmm.com/images/photolib/159105.jpg)
The Z270 Supercarrier however matches the energy consumption of $130-180 ATX motherboards and even outperforms a few of them.
![realtek alc1220 driver asrock z270 realtek alc1220 driver asrock z270](https://i.imgur.com/EEXvFBJ.png)
With the many controllers, components and RGB lighting that this motherboard features, we expected it to significantly surpass the energy consumption of mainstream ATX motherboards based on the same chipset. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.Īlthough the energy consumption of the ASRock Z270 Supercarrier appears to be on the high side, it actually is lower than what we initially expected it to be.
#Realtek alc1220 driver asrock z270 series
While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. This power supply is Platinum rated, and as I am on a 230-240 V supply, leads to ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single MSI GTX 770 Lightning GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Corsair AX1200i power supply. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however this is not the case.